Share this article on
August 11, 2026
Community

This summer, librarians taking part in the DigLib project are conducting a diagnosis of the digital competencies of their local communities. This is the fundamental first step towards setting up a Living Lab in each of the libraries.
Why start here? Conducting a local needs assessment is a foundational step in the design of any effective digital competence training, not just one intended for the Living Lab. Without a reliable diagnosis, there is a risk that educational initiatives will address irrelevant problems, resulting in low attendance, disengagement, and minimal learning impact. A good assessment identifies participants' profiles, their current skill levels, specific barriers, and learning preferences.
There is a second benefit: asking community members about their needs boosts their early engagement and motivation, while enabling training providers to divide diverse groups into learning pathways tailored to their needs.
-Competency Test: An online self-assessment (such as Europass digital skills test) that evaluates participant knowledge in key digital areas in order to determine their strengths and identify learning priorities.
-Pre-Training Survey: A concise, structured questionnaire designed to quickly gather quantitative and qualitative data from a broad group of respondents.
-"Talking Wall": An interactive visual board set up in public or event spaces where community members visually share answers to key questions.
-Focus Group Interview: A moderated discussion with 6–10 representatives of a specific demographic group to explore attitudes, needs, and barriers in depth.
-Desk Research and Resource Mapping: An examination of existing demographic data, municipal strategic plans, local infrastructure, and current educational offers, in order to contextualise community needs.
(1) The process of conducting a local diagnosis begins with the planning and design phase, during which the organisers define the primary objective, target groups, core research questions, diagnostic methods, timeline, and potential risks.
(2) Once this framework is established, the data collection phase begins with the implementation of the chosen primary research tools.
(3) The collected data is then synthesised and prioritised in order to segment the population into clear user profiles and evaluate priorities using a decision-making matrix.
(4) Finally, the diagnosis culminates in a concise report detailing key findings and recommendations, which serves as the basis for designing courses, establishing local partnerships, and securing funding.
Taking the time to do this properly pays off later: it ensures that training programmes will deliver targeted, highly engaging, and lasting educational outcomes for the community. The results feed directly into the Living Labs opening in the participating libraries this autumn.